I think this is just the way it is. The alternative is heavy moderation, which leads to no content.
I do not find it hard to filter out the crap. If some 50 year old accountant wants to pretend he is a thug dropping n bombs, I can take it as cheap entertainment.
He has dropped a lot of verified content, that is helpful. I do find it funny it tends to trigger people so easily given how over the top it is.
I believe in respecting and protecting women. However, it is also a good reality check for guys from a pure safety POV, when they are barebacking an MPA and are under the illusion they are the only one. There are a lot of pure whores in this business.
It doesn't have to be that way at all. It can be any way Admin decides to run the site.
Agree that heavy moderation leads to no content, but I'm not advocating for heavy moderation. There is an entire continuum of moderation possibilities so it's not a binary all or nothing proposition. I am asking for a bare minimum: no incitement of crimes against women.
It doesn't have to be TERB. If admin wants it to be a site where bored middle aged losers post like crazy pretending they're gangsters then sure you can just tune them out if you wish. But even you are saying they are providing useful intel! Do you not see the potential problems when some people think it's useful intel to stick it in when she says no? That's rape!
Freedom of speech is great but you still can't yell 'fire' in a crowded theatre. Yes the lack of heavy moderation helps make this a site where you can speak really openly, but the absolute bare minimum of moderation - not permitting or encouraging criminal acts - will barely change the site content at all! It's the very least that can be done to try to protect the women that make the entire hobby possible.
If are for respecting and protecting the women it's very hard to understand how you square that with not being OK to moderate someone who is advising guys to CIM of sex workers after they've been explicitly told not to. You simply can't take it for granted that it's all obviously really lame comedy and no one will take it seriously.
When you think about it literally zero moderation is a needless extreme that does more harm than good. Admin already did something about girls getting doxed by people posting their family pictures, addresses, social media, personal details etc. Who is against that moderation?
It's just as easy and humane to do something about guys who are glorifying sexual assault, and this website will still pretty much be exactly as it was a few days ago before this latest troll duplicated himself.