Review: Slow Tease With Tiffany

[Abbagail]

Date: 9-12-09
Provider: Tiffany
Phone: 713-781-4464
Email Address: none
URL / Website: none
City: Houston
State: Texas
Address: Fondren Rd, next to where Volvo karaoke used to be. I think this place is called "Jessie's Salon".
Appointment Type: Spa
Activities: NE, SE, HJ, (but reluctant at first).
Session Length: 60 Min (lasted 60 min - exactly 60 min)
Fee: $50 fee, $70 paid
Hair Length and Color: Brown, short, tied back
Age: 28
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Nationality: Vietnamese
Physical Description: 7.5/10 face. 7.5/10 Body. Slender build, about 5'4, 115 lbs. No ink, No metal.
Very conservatively dressed.
Recommendation: Yes

 

[The Jenz]

I would have given that session thumbs down and a NO.
Just MHO.

rr

 

[amethystannie]

The lady may have been reluctant at first and probably unaccustomed to providing what I wanted, but she is young, pretty and did comply with my requests even if it was in her own sweet time.

She will get better with time and deserves a definite YES, but you're welcome to your opinion, rr.

To me, training a shy girl is one rewarding part of the experience, but only if you have confidence and patience which not everyone does.

 

[PH D]

She is a registered masseuse, clearly posted in the open.

 

[leah g.]

Are you her dad, sir?

"Hey, she told me that her dad was dead"

 

[Christian guy]

Well Hell!
I like a slow tease, so I ran out to this place today to check it out.
Tiffany, not there, on vacation.
Got Cindy who was really very pretty, petite, and was glad to see me.
Attitude was excellent....too bad she does NO EXTRAS.
That sucks! but she dont, and she will not touch either....at least with me.
I've entered a losing streak guys, I have had 2 massages in a row now without extras.
I guess I really need to get BCD here. How many reviews do I need to post? I'll post this one as a no recommendation, not that it was a bad time, but I didn't get what I went there for.

 

[Captain Falcon]

Sorry to hear about your experience, Smoke2nd, but then we all hit slumps on the hobby road. Just get back in the saddle.

If you've got 2 acceptable reviews, you should be able to get BCD credit.

Just send a PM to one of the mods working the forums.

With a little better intel, you'll hit one out of the park and then you can write a review and tell us about it.

Hang in there!

 

[Pancakes]

Dad has a valid point here.
Where is the source of this info?

 

[AjaLee]

Personally, I consider the question of whether the lady is or is not a registered masseuse 2 B fairly irrelevant for all intents and purposes of the visit.

I think that what actually matters to most members here is what quality of service does the lady provide, her attitude and her price range and menu.

Unless we have one of those arcane rules on this board too about not reviewing registered masseuses, but then I have never understood the purpose of that one.

 

[Jaimy]

We will agree to disagree on this one.

I will look forward to reading future reviews as progress reviews of this AMP WIP. It is one thing to 'train' a shy girl (I was one of the first to visit Cindy at the trailer years ago). We are very comfortable with each other, which is why we enjoy time together with such gusto. I have found many other amps to be just a rub and tug, doing as little of it and as quickly as possible to get your coin and show you to the door. (Sakura for example.)

I would rather invest in a Lily or Ashley or Brook. Experiencing and encouraging new talent who give much more consistent service is more rewarding for me; and Cindy near SHRP when I am in the area and she is available.


rr

 

[:.Jamie.:]

No, I am not her Dad.

SlowGun, are you her boyfriend or her WK?

You could not be Jessie's husband because I know that idiot personally.

You could not be Jessie's mom son either because I also know her personally.

I got it... You must be Jessie's boy toy and Tiffany's wanabe boyfriend!

Enough info to make you believe that I know Tiffany?

I am her fucking boyfriend!

So, fuck off! Don't be a WK!! Just because I told you that she is LMT/RMT!!!

 

[castaspella0183]

Hey, easy, there Fido!

You picked a peculiar handle of "Dad" and that is all I was joking about.

Mods, I recommend that you keep your eye on this character and I would suggest you point him for misconduct.

He seems to have lost his perspective and is starting to make personal insults to imagined slights.

 

[Mrs.RighT]

Htowner, want to shoot some pool on Westheimer next Wednesday after your work? Impromptu meetings are the best!

 

[Brendan]

I speak for myself, but I dare say with the approbation of others that any rule employed to protect the legitimate interests of another member or provider would never be considered arcane, but rather easily understood and appreciated. Is the word arcane arcane to you?
Perhaps you meant archaic? If so, then OOPS, it seems you were tripped up by your own ignorance and arrogant indifference to the welfare of others.

It takes but little wisdom to understand that a professional masseuse who engages in the hobby as a provider is subject to sanctions greater than the client's, including the loss of license and livelihood. Maintaining an UTR presence is vital to their welfare. NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND? THAT is why ASPD (and hopefully this site) will impose that restriction of prohibiting BCD reviews details of known LMT/RMT's. We appreciate both the excellence of their LMT skills, and the intimate pleasures we may be privileged to share, too.

For the purpose of building their business in the hobby, they usually depend on word of mouth from one friend to another. I have had several such ladies request of me and insist to me NOT TO BE REVIEWED. They cannot risk the exposure. They must remain UTR.

Out of respect for those talented ladies who are licensed, you will never get any referral from me to any of them. Having read your boorish post today, you have made it clear that you have no understanding, concern, appreciation nor perspective of the real world, nor of our responsibilities to one another in the hobby.

"Personally, I consider the question of whether the lady is or is not a registered masseuse 2 B fairly irrelevant for all intents and purposes of the visit." -- is one of the most insensitive and narrow-minded things I have read on a board ever.

I am no WK -- not coming to anyone's defense. No defense of them is needed, except to keep you and your ilk away from these quality ladies who have too much at stake to risk seeing the likes of you.

Did you ever see a blind eel? Go look in a mirror.

rr

 

[guerrero82]

Damn, RR, you sure do tax people's patience on the board with your officious and continuous hair splitting.

Maybe "archaic" is a better word than "arcane", but my message is still clearly understood as written.

Were you an English major and just want to show off your meager writing skills or are you simply a frustrated provocateur like the unbalanced dad (who is now trying to kiss up to the mods with blatant pool bribery to avoid penalties for his misconduct).

Anyway, I would say that most girls appreciate a good review since it helps their business, but if Tiffany tells me otherwise then I will ask the mods to take my review down.

 

[Smiley Face]

Fast Gunn, Words have meaning. Whom are you trying to impress? You impress people by your vocabulary, especially when you use it like Norm Crosby. I cannot remember the last time I heard the word arcane used in conversation, or saw it in print, until you mis-used it in this thread. Your message would be laughable if it were not of a serious nature. Yes, the inconsiderate message is clear enough, and I say the 'legal' welfare of providers ought to be our shared concern, to not put them at risk by posting reviews.

Yes, I slapped you around a bit verbally to get your attention.
Officious? Yes indeed and without apology. Mine is unofficial and informal advice, unwanted by you. I seek no office, and I will speak my mind.

Perhaps you are too much of a newbie to know that LMT's / RMT's can lose their license permanently and their freedom for a while for such violations.

But since you are no newbie, I must believe that you know, but do not give a tinker's dam about the consequences.

You would do well to reconsider your blatant disregard (my opinion of what you have stated in this thread) for the interests of the LMT who also 'provides'. When you see a LMT or two get busted, you will also see that resource of the hobby dwindle as those are carted off and others shutter their doors to the hobbyist. That is not hair-splitting. That is recent history. But I doubt you would recognize genuine hair-splitting since you lack the requisite mental acuity to see the hair, much less to split it; and/or lack the character and compassion to give a dam about them.

Let us regard massageplanet as a community. As such we ought to be considerate of others' legitimate interests. Such behavior as Fast Gunn's ought to be policed by someone for the good of the community, especially our LMT friends.

By the way, Fast Gunn, your goats are scattered all over the landscape. You ought to take a step back from this battle and round them up before anymore are lost. The Rogue is already serving cabrito fajitas con frijoles y arroz! Bienvenido mi amigos y amigas!

By the way Fast Gunn, most often it is not the fastest gun who survives but the one who shoots straightest. The fastest gun often shoots himself in the foot and misses his target. It is far better to shoot straight with pistols, and with people.

Officiously yours,

rr

 

[Typical Teenager]

Aside from any rules, my belief is that we should not review either (1) known LMT/RMT's (unless they request or publicly advertise clearly sexual activities, in which case maybe they don't care about risking their license) or (2) UTR girls who don't have a license but don't want to be reviewed and are worried about attracting LE or undesirable customers. It's not always clear whether a lady falls within one of these categories, but many times we have a pretty good idea, or the lady tells us she doesn't want any review. Often I refrain from reviewing or posting anything explicit about the BCD activities of a lady that I think is probably in one of the categories above--until I start to see on the board (or other boards) a fair number of other members that post about her BCD activities. Then I may chime in. Even so, I am not likely to post or PM that the lady does, for example, BJ or FS, if I continue to think that she really does not want to be reviewed, even if others are reviewing BJ or FS from her.

Maybe others feel differently, but to me I think we should try to protect the ladies that want to keep their "extra activities" private.

 

[Deena Lockers]

Being a dirty old man myself but raised in a restricted protection of female family I would definite agree with RR and Dad.
I have had a long career in my chosen profession. Would I give my career up for 10 seconds of a client's happiness? Especially if it meant the end of my career?
I would easily say no without a heatbeat delay.

Yes, I love women and the hobby presents an allure of doing something naughty and forbidden by law. I am very thankful for ASPd and this website for its' steering away from the things that could hurt me.

I am not a Buddhist but they do have a strong point with their mantra of "do no harm"
You have also heard that phrase because licensed DOCTORS swear it as part of their oath.
I end this diatribe with

Do no harm to others

 

[LYNBOP mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm]

Houston nail salons and VN talent is like the box of chocolates meeting, well, umm, another box of chocolates.

First off, they know why you're there. So, it becomes a question of comfort level and how much are they willing to give up over a number of visits. You might be surprised how fast the menu expands from, say, session one, to sessions three or four.

One VN talent, one known to quite a few here, went from handjobs, to full blown PSE in a matter of 3-4 visits. Turns out that i) she really liked it in the ass, and ii) she liked it even more getting paid for it lol.

@VNgirlfan: I agree with the sentiment of your post....nail salons are kind of touchy, since it is a legitimate business front. Consider a couple of them in the Galleria/Westchase area that actually services some female clientele. Also, with the four masseuses on staff at the one I frequent, the menus are all over the place depending on who you are, and how many times you've gotten a massage from her (and maybe how much money you spend there overall). I mean, one one lady of interest there, I've gotten feedback ranging from "shitty attitude" to guys just glowing coming in and out of the room. You just never know.

 

[Robert G]

Reply to weasel99. I agree with your observations about nail shops. It has been my experience over the years that, if you become a regular (for some girls this means 3 visits, and for others, it could be 20 visits or more) with a girl you find attractive and who likes you, more often than not, FS develops somewhere along the way. If not that, then at least a very expanded menu compared to the first couple of visits. But many--probably most--of us, including me, often decide to move on after just one or two visits--the girl or the session isn't that great, the price is too high or the minutes are short-changed, or the facilities or location isn't great, or whatever. It has also been my experience that if you get along great with one girl at a place and then find a friendly way to move to a second girl at the same place (maybe the first girl leaves for a while), the menu expansion is vastly accelerated. On one occasion I was doing FS on visit 2 with a girl that I don't think ever would have done that with me but for my established standing with her friend, girl 1.